ÐÓÑÑÊÈÉ | ENGLISH | DEUTSCH | FRANCAIS |

Yu. D. Buslenko

Atomic physics specialists know well that dimensionless atomic constants (fine structure constants, ratio of proton and electron masses, ratio of electron shell and nucleus dimensions, ratio of proton and electron magnetic moments, etc.)are calculating on basis of experimental information. Up till now no one managed to calculate those constants theoretically, and to interlink them by formulas.

I point to the fact that any dimensionless constants do not depend on such
measures as kilograms, meters, seconds, and their combinations, and therefore
are of higher degree of generalization as compared with physical magnitudes,
which use these measurements. For example, numbers p
≈ 3,14 è **å**** ≈ **2,72 appear in mathematical physics as
dimensionless constants. But it doesn’t mean that those numbers are applied
only in physics. I think the calculation technique of dimensionless atomic constants
is to be found by some general and accurate laws of nature, in which physical
laws would appear as particular and specific cases. I offer atomic physicists
to abandon monopolistic claims on truth, and to look for problem-solution along
with other disciplines scientists. Beware of being said to be dilettantes. Your
potential partners, who somehow know atom, feel confident within the bounds
of their specialties, and become powerless beyond the bounds. Different sciences
interaction is to give such an objective knowledge, which is unlikely to be
revealed within the bounds of som separate discipline. It is impossible for
two men or two women to give birth to descendants.

1.Theorem of irregular mass moving as physical variant of Godel’s theorem. Additional (cross-cut) factor is on this move. Time division into basic and additional as applied to inert and electrical mass properties. Electric charge nature.

2.Formula that binds up fine structure constant a
with the numbers **1, 3, p, å, i **by means of equal
probability of two alternative events, integer-valued parameter of discreteness.
a periodicity in complex quantities.

3.Theoretical ratio of proton and electron masses b** _{p}**,
neutron and electron b

4.Theoretical ratio of g** _{í }**dimensions
of electronic shell and nucleus by the example of hydrogen atom.

5.Integer spin division into half-integer spin circumferentially and by tractrix.

6**.**m_{å} anomaly of electron
magnetic moments, m** _{ð}**ratio of proton
and electron magnetic moments.

7.Nucleus as a nucleon system. Fundamental irreducibility of nucleus mass to free nucleons masses sum. Nucleus mass fault. Theoretical calculation (without use of Weizsacker’s formula) binding energy density for heavy hydrogen, helium, and other heavy components nucleuses. Functional binding of mass number and nuclear stability.

8.Formula that binds gravitation constant (?)and nuclear constants, and Universe parameters.

9.Theorem ï.1 consequences correspondence test to basic aspects and formulas of classic physics, quantum mechanics, and theory of relativity.

10.Mathematical reflection of quantitative changes to quality ones. Variable unit as quality and quantity indivisible quantum. Binding continuous quantity change and discrete quality change by the example of quantum-unit. Quantum calculation as an alternative to mathematical infinite methods. Philosophical interpretation and geometrical notion of universal constants a, b, g.

11.Cost quantization. Benefit (surplus value) as a factor of form of economical development. Repetition factor of pace of development by constant a. Time division into basic and additional as applied to pace of development. Large-scale economical system functioning under conditions where its elements have different paces of development.

I will cite fourteen constants meanings, which were theoretically calculated
on bases of unified mathematical model: 1. Slope ratio of spiral development
for elementary cycle a = **137,0013199 ^{-1}…**;
2. Ratio of symmetric and asymmetric under oppositions interaction b=

The constant truth, calculated by me, is rather doubtful. As it is known, to err is human.

It concerns me, and opponents that would like to test my hypothesis. Truth is the only one for everyone. Hence it should be revealed by alternative versions comparison of one and the same problem. Mathematicians, physicists, economists, philosophers, and others, who can refute or verify the constants, declared by me, please let me know. I will reveal my method in exchange for the methods, suggested by independent opponents.

*This article and its duplicates are published on the following site: www.bus-atom.ru
Yuriy Dmitriyevich Buslenko
is registered at the following addresses. Postal address: post office box 916,
the city of Saratov, 410012, Russia;
E-mail: *

August 15, 2003.